Franklin v. Parnell, et al. (MAG+)

Filing 8

ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) The plaintiff's objection (Doc. # 7 ) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on February 18, 2014 are overru led; (2) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 6 ) entered on February 4, 2014 is adopted; (3) Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, and because the Court should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state civil law claims. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 2/20/14. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
NUE CHEER FRANKLIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
JUSTIN MATTHEW PARNELL, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:13-cv-954-MEF
WO

ORDER
After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE
of the court that:
1. The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #7 ) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge
filed on February 18, 2014 are overruled;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #6) entered on February 4,
2014 is adopted;
3. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, and because the Court should decline to
exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state civil law claims.
DONE this the 20th day of February, 2014.

/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE