Twyman v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 5

ORDER directing that, upon an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case, the court finds the Plaintiff's objection to be without merit, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) The the extent that the objection may be in terpreted as an objection to the Magistrate Judge's order denying the Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, the court finds the order to be neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, and the objection is OVERRULED; (2) The P laintiff's objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is OVERRULED; (3) The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the initiation of this case. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/5/14. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ROBERT TWYMAN, JR., #147435,
Plaintiff,
v.
KIM ROBIAS THOMAS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-0010-TMH

ORDER
This case is before the court on the Order and Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge (Doc. #3), entered on January 27, 2014, and the Plaintiff's Response, treated as an
Objection, to the same (Doc. #4), filed on February 5, 2014. Upon an independent evaluation
and de novo review of the file in this case, the court finds the Plaintiff's objection to be
without merit, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The the extent that the objection may be interpreted as an objection to the
Magistrate Judge's order denying the Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, the
court finds the order to be neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, and the objection is
OVERRULED.
2. The Plaintiff's objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is
OVERRULED.
3. The court ADOPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and this case
is DISMISSED without prejudice for the Plaintiff's failure to pay the full filing fee upon the
initiation of this case.

Done this 5th day of March, 2014.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2