Griffin v. Neptune Technology Group
Filing
106
JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant Neptune Technology Group's motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 37 ) is granted as to plaintiff Joshua Griffin's Title VII retaliation claimbased on 039;internal complaints.' (2) Said motion is denied as to plaintiff Griffin's COBRA claim. This claim shall go to trial. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/13/2015. (dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
JOSHUA GRIFFIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
NEPTUNE TECHNOLOGY GROUP,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv16-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the opinion entered this date,
it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as
follows:
(1) Defendant Neptune Technology Group's motion for
summary
judgment
(doc.
no.
37)
is
granted
as
to
plaintiff Joshua Griffin's Title VII retaliation claim
based on 'internal complaints.'
(2) Said motion is denied as to plaintiff Griffin's
COBRA claim.
This claim shall go to trial.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
docket
as
a
final
judgment
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
the
Federal
Rules
of
Procedure.
This case is not closed.
DONE, this the 13th day of April, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Civil
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?