Clay v. Thompson et al(MAG+)

Filing 42

ORDER: Upon consideration of the 35 Recommendation and the 41 Objections, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, the Objections are OVERRULED, Defendants' 17 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/23/2014. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CLARENCE CLAY,
Plaintiff,
v.
MYRON H. THOMPSON, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-131-WKW

ORDER
On June 26, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this
case, (Doc. # 35), to which Plaintiff has filed timely Objections, (Doc. # 41). The
court has conducted an independent and de novo review of those portions of the
Recommendation to which objection is made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Upon consideration of the Recommendation and the Objections, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, the Objections are
OVERRULED, Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. # 17) is GRANTED, and this
case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
DONE this 23rd day of July, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE