Negron v. Barber et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
15
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the 9 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; (2) Plf's allegations of excessive force and a false disciplinary charge which occurred on or about September 14, 2011 is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) (2)(B)(i) as these claims were not filed within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitations; (3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/3/14. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
BRANDON S. NEGRON, #200854,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANTHONY BARBER, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-132-MEF
WO
ORDER
On April 9, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #9) in this
case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file
in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. Plaintiff's allegations of excessive force and a false disciplinary charge which
occurred on or about September 14, 2011 is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)
as these claims were not filed within the time prescribed by the applicable period of
limitations.
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
DONE this the day 3rd of June, 2014.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?