Negron v. Barber et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
20
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1) the plaintiff's 10 Objection to Report and Recommendation is overruled; (2) the 9 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3) Plaintiff's allegations of excessi ve force and a false disciplinary charge which occurred on or about September 14, 2011 are DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as these claims are not filed within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitations; (4) this case is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 6/18/14. (djy, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
BRANDON S. NEGRON, #200854,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
ANTHONY BARBER, et al.,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-132-MEF
WO
ORDER
After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE
of the court that:
1. The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #10) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge filed on April 23, 2014 is overruled;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #9) entered on April 9, 2014
is adopted;
3. Plaintiff's allegations of excessive force and a false disciplinary charge which
occurred on or about September 14, 2011 are DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as these claims are not filed within the time prescribed by the applicable
period of limitations.
4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
DONE this the 18th day of June, 2014.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?