Bell v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 98

ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:1. The defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 2. The plaintiffs claims against Lisa Bonner are DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. The plaintiffs claims agains t the remaining defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice as these claims are barred from review by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and its progeny. 4. This case is DISMISSED. 5. No costs are taxed herein. A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 11/18/2016. (kh, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
KARIOUS N. BELL,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
KIM THOMAS, et al.,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-238-WHA

ORDER
This cause is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge entered on
October 31, 2016 (Doc. #97). There being no timely objection to the Recommendation, and after
review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
2. The plaintiff’s claims against Lisa Bonner are DISMISSED with prejudice.

3.

The plaintiff’s claims against the remaining defendants are DISMISSED

without prejudice as these claims are barred from review by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S.
477 (1994) and its progeny.
4. This case is DISMISSED.
5. No costs are taxed herein.
A separate Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
DONE this 18th day of November, 2016.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE