Hatcher v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 29

ORDER directing that, there being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Strange are DISMISSED with p rejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii). 2. Defendant Strange is DISMISSED as a party defendant. 3. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/9/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION RONALD LEE HATCHER, #153577, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. GOV. ROBERT BENTLEY, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:14cv348-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #24), entered on August 18, 2014. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Strange are DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-iii). 2. Defendant Strange is DISMISSED as a party defendant. 3. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE this 9th day of September, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?