Hooten v. Boyer

Filing 53

ORDER denying with leave to refile the 50 and 51 Motions for Extension of time, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/11/15. (djy, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

SIDNEY HOOTEN,
individually and as an
incapacitated person by
and through his next
friend Nicole Harris,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
BRIAN KEITH BOYER,
individually and as an
employee of Arkansas
State University and the
State of Arkansas,
et al.,
Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv355-MHT
(WO)

ORDER
It is ORDERED that the motions for extension of
time (doc. nos. 50 and 51) are denied with leave to
refile.
***
This

court

has

made

clear

that,

“A

request

or

motion for extension of a deadline in any court order
... must indicate that movant has, in a timely manner,

previously contacted counsel for all other parties; and
..., based on that contact, must state whether counsel
for all other parties agree to or oppose the extension
request or motion,” and that, “A request or motion that
fails to meet this requirement will be denied outright,
unless the movant offers a credible explanation in the
request or motion why this requirement has not been
met.”

Scheduling Order (doc. no. 13), § 15(B).

Movant

here has failed to comply with these requirements.
DONE, this the 11th day of May, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE