Figaro v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)

Filing 18

ORDER directing that, there being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) The Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 15 ) is GRANTED; (2) This case is DISMISSED without prejudice; (3) No costs are taxed; (4) Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/18/14. (scn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FORTHE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION

VINCENT PAUL FIGARO, #263335,
Plaintiff,
vs.
KIM TOBIAS THOMAS, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:14-cv-358-WHA
(WO)

ORDER
This case is before the court on the Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #15) and the
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17), entered on August 27, 2014. There being
no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the
Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #15) is GRANTED.
2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. No costs are taxed.
4. Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with this order.
DONE this 18th day of September, 2014.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE