Goodrich v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 10

ORDER directing that, after an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case, the 9 objection lacks merit and is hereby OVERRULED, because the Petitioner has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive § 2255 motion; the 2 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice; Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 7/29/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION STEVEN WAYNE GOODRICH, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:14cv-540-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #2), entered on June 24, 2014, and the Petitioner’s Argument in Opposition (Doc. #9), filed on July 28, 2014. After an independent evaluation and de novo review of the file in this case, the objection lacks merit and is hereby OVERRULED, because the Petitioner has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider a successive § 2255 motion. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. DONE this 29th day of July, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?