Lee v. Darbouze, et al. (INMATE 1)

Filing 13

ORDER directing that, upon an independent and de novo review of those portions of the 8 Recommendation to which objection is made, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), it is ORDERED that the 11 objection is OVERRULED, that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to pay the filing and administrative fees upon his initiation of this case. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/1/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION GREGORY LEE, # 184070, Plaintiff, v. DR. DARBOUZE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:14-CV-584-WKW ORDER On July 8, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which Plaintiff filed a timely objection. (Docs. # 8, 11.) Upon an independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), it is ORDERED that the objection is OVERRULED, that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing and administrative fees upon his initiation of this case. DONE this 1st day of August, 2014. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?