Garland v. Alabama State University et al
ORDER, re 62 Second Amended Complaint, that both Alabama State University and the Board of Trustees of Alabama State University are dfts in this case; If plfs intended for only one of these to be a dft, the plfs are, within seven days, to file a motion to dismiss the dft that they did not intend to include. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/23/2015. (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
DR. JOHN L. GARLAND
and DR. STEVEN B. CHESBRO, )
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY; )
CIVIL ACTION NO.
From the second amended complaint (doc. no. 62), it
Board of Trustees of Alabama State University or both
The amended complaint lists only the
Board of Trustees in the style while ¶¶ 1 and 12 list
only ASU as the defendant.
To resolve this ambiguity,
it is ORDERED that both Alabama State University and
the Board of Trustees of Alabama State University are
defendants in this case.
If plaintiffs intended for
only one of these to be a defendant, the plaintiffs
are, within seven days, to file a motion to dismiss the
defendant that they did not intend to include.
DONE, this the 23rd day of April, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson___
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?