Carey v. Hale, et al. (INMATE 2)

Filing 37

ORDER: Upon consideration of the parties 34 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, which comports with FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action has been dismissed with prejudice by operation of Rule 41, on the terms agreed to and set out by the parties. Accordingly, Defendants 17 Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs 35 Motion to Dismiss are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/29/2017. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CARLOS CAREY, Plaintiff, v. MS. HALE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:14-CV-590-WKW [WO] ORDER Upon consideration of the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. # 34), which comports with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this action has been dismissed with prejudice by operation of Rule 41, on the terms agreed to and set out by the parties. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 17) and Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 35) are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case. DONE this 29th day of June, 2017. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?