Boyd v. ERMC, II, LP et al
OPINION. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/11/2015. (dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
MARTINE D. BOYD,
ERMC, II, LP, a foreign
CIVIL ACTION NO.
Plaintiff Martine D. Boyd charges defendant ERMC,
II, LP, with sexual harassment under Title VII of the
§§ 1981a & 2000e through 2000e-17), and negligence and
original jurisdiction over her federal claims under 28
rights), and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(3) (Title VII).
state-law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
originated in state court and was removed to federal
court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441.
It is now before
the court on ERMC’s motion for summary judgment.
March 9, 2015, Boyd conceded that she did not file her
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charge
within the requisite 180-day statutory period, and that
her federal claim
accordingly was time-barred.
National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S.
plaintiffs to file EEOC charges within 180 days after
the alleged unlawful employment practice occurred, and
discrimination that occur outside this statutory time
Therefore, by agreement of the parties and
summary judgment is due to be entered in favor of ERMC
on Boyd’s federal claims.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE, this the 11th day of March, 2015.
_/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?