Boyd v. ERMC, II, LP et al
Filing
42
JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant ERMC, II, LP's 29 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted as to plaintiff Martine D. Boyd's federal claim. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant ERMC II, LP and against plaintiff Boyd, with plaintiff Boyd taking nothing by her federal claim. (3) The clerk of the court is to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/11/2015. (dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
MARTINE D. BOYD,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
ERMC, II, LP, a foreign
limited partnership,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv591-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Defendant
judgment
ERMC,
(doc.
II,
LP’s
motion
no.
29)
is
for
summary
granted
as
to
plaintiff Martine D. Boyd’s federal claim.
(2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant ERMC,
II,
LP
and
against
plaintiff
Boyd,
with
plaintiff Boyd taking nothing by her federal
claim.
(3) The
clerk
document
of
on
the
the
court
civil
is
to
docket
enter
as
a
this
final
judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is not closed.
DONE, this the 11th day of March, 2015.
_/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?