Boyd v. ERMC, II, LP et al

Filing 42

JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant ERMC, II, LP's 29 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted as to plaintiff Martine D. Boyd's federal claim. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant ERMC II, LP and against plaintiff Boyd, with plaintiff Boyd taking nothing by her federal claim. (3) The clerk of the court is to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/11/2015. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION MARTINE D. BOYD, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ERMC, II, LP, a foreign limited partnership, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv591-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant judgment ERMC, (doc. II, LP’s motion no. 29) is for summary granted as to plaintiff Martine D. Boyd’s federal claim. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant ERMC, II, LP and against plaintiff Boyd, with plaintiff Boyd taking nothing by her federal claim. (3) The clerk document of on the the court civil is to docket enter as a this final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 11th day of March, 2015. _/s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?