Dunn et al v. Thomas et al
Filing
1353
PHASE 2A INVOLUNTARY MEDICATION SETTLEMENT FINAL APPROVAL ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The objections to the settlement agreement (doc. nos. 1310 , 1316 , & 1322 -2) are overruled. (2) The settlement agreement (doc. no. 1248 -1) is app roved. (3) The settlement agreement (doc. no. 1248 -1) is entered as a consent decree. (4) United States Magistrate Judge John E. Ott is appointed to serve as mediator pursuant to § 16 of the consent decree entered today. (5) Plaintiffs' m otion for attorneys' fees (doc. no. 1346 ), which defendants do not oppose, is granted. (6) Pursuant to the provision in the settlement agreement (doc. no. 1248 -1) for the dismissal with prejudice of any and all claims asserted by plaintiff Q uang Bui regarding the involuntary-medication policies and/or practices, these claims are dismissed with prejudice. (7) By no later than September 20, 2017, the parties are to meet and confer and submit to the court a plan for providing notice to cla ss members of the entry of this consent decree and for ensuring that they have access to the decree during its pendency. The notice of settlement should describe in layperson's terms the involuntary-medication policy and procedure, as well as ho w a prisoner may go about challenging an involuntary-medication order or a violation of the policy requiring an involuntary-medication order before using force or coercion to administer medication to a prisoner. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/6/2017. (kh, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
EDWARD BRAGGS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JEFFERSON S. DUNN, in his
official capacity as
Commissioner of
the Alabama Department of
Corrections, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv601-MHT
(WO)
PHASE 2A INVOLUNTARY MEDICATION SETTLEMENT
FINAL APPROVAL ORDER
Based
upon
the
representations
of
counsel
at
a
fairness hearing held in open court on August 24, 2017,
on
the
proposed
settlement
concerning
plaintiffs’
claims of involuntary medication without due process;
upon
consideration
of
the
proposed
settlement,
the
joint motion for approval of the proposed settlement,
the objections to the proposed settlement, and other
related
filings;
and
with
the
understanding
that
an
opinion will follow explaining the court’s reasoning,
it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The
objections
to
the
settlement
agreement
(doc. nos. 1310, 1316, & 1322-2) are overruled.
(2) The settlement agreement (doc. no. 1248-1) is
approved.
(3) The settlement agreement (doc. no. 1248-1) is
entered as a consent decree.
(4) United States Magistrate Judge John E. Ott is
appointed to serve as mediator pursuant to § 16 of the
consent decree entered today.
(5) Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees (doc.
no. 1346), which defendants do not oppose, is granted.
(6) Pursuant
agreement
(doc.
to
no.
the
provision
1248-1)
for
in
the
the
settlement
dismissal
with
prejudice of any and all claims asserted by plaintiff
Quang Bui regarding the involuntary-medication policies
and/or
practices,
these
claims
prejudice.
2
are
dismissed
with
(7)
By
no
later
than
September
20,
2017,
the
parties are to meet and confer and submit to the court
a plan for providing notice to class members of the
entry of this consent decree and for ensuring that they
have access to the decree during its pendency.
notice
of
settlement
should
describe
in
The
layperson's
terms the involuntary-medication policy and procedure,
as well as how a prisoner may go about challenging an
involuntary-medication
order
or
a
violation
of
the
policy requiring an involuntary-medication order before
using force or coercion to administer medication to a
prisoner.
DONE, this the 6th day of September, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?