Dunn et al v. Thomas et al

Filing 168

ORDER ON SUGGESTIONS OF DEATHS: It is ORDERED as follows: (1) In light of the suggestions of the deaths of plaintiffs Sherry Baker and Bobby Copeland (doc. nos. 165 and 125 ), if the plaintiffs' counsel intend to replace these plaintiffs wit h other inmates (as opposed to making a substitution pursuant to Rule 25(a) of the FRCP), the plaintiffs counsel are to make the replacements by no later than 6/23/2015. (2) If the plaintiffs counsel agree that there should be no substitution pursuant to Rule 25(a), the plaintiffs counsel are to dismiss plaintiffs Baker and Copeland by no later than 6/23/2015. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/19/2015. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JOSHUA DUNN, et al., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv601-MHT (WO) ORDER ON SUGGESTIONS OF DEATHS Based on the representations made on the record on May 18, 2015, and so as to keep this litigation moving, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) In light of the suggestions of the deaths of plaintiffs Sherry Baker and Bobby Copeland (doc. nos. 165 and 125), if the plaintiffs’ counsel intend to replace these plaintiffs with other inmates (as opposed to making a substitution Federal pursuant Rules plaintiffs’ of to Rule Civil counsel are 25(a) of the Procedure), to the make the replacements by no later than June 23, 2015. (2) If the should plaintiffs’ be no counsel substitution agree that pursuant to there Rule 25(a), the plaintiffs’ counsel are to dismiss plaintiffs Baker and Copeland by no later than June 23, 2015. DONE, this the 19th day of May, 2015. ___/s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?