Dunn et al v. Thomas et al
Filing
168
ORDER ON SUGGESTIONS OF DEATHS: It is ORDERED as follows: (1) In light of the suggestions of the deaths of plaintiffs Sherry Baker and Bobby Copeland (doc. nos. 165 and 125 ), if the plaintiffs' counsel intend to replace these plaintiffs wit h other inmates (as opposed to making a substitution pursuant to Rule 25(a) of the FRCP), the plaintiffs counsel are to make the replacements by no later than 6/23/2015. (2) If the plaintiffs counsel agree that there should be no substitution pursuant to Rule 25(a), the plaintiffs counsel are to dismiss plaintiffs Baker and Copeland by no later than 6/23/2015. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/19/2015. (dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
JOSHUA DUNN, et al.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
v.
JEFFERSON S. DUNN, in his
official capacity as
Commissioner of the
Alabama Department of
Corrections, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv601-MHT
(WO)
ORDER ON SUGGESTIONS OF DEATHS
Based on the representations made on the record on
May 18, 2015, and so as to keep this litigation moving,
it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) In light of the suggestions of the deaths of
plaintiffs
Sherry
Baker
and
Bobby
Copeland
(doc. nos. 165 and 125), if the plaintiffs’
counsel intend to replace these plaintiffs with
other
inmates
(as
opposed
to
making
a
substitution
Federal
pursuant
Rules
plaintiffs’
of
to
Rule
Civil
counsel
are
25(a)
of
the
Procedure),
to
the
make
the
replacements by no later than June 23, 2015.
(2) If
the
should
plaintiffs’
be
no
counsel
substitution
agree
that
pursuant
to
there
Rule
25(a), the plaintiffs’ counsel are to dismiss
plaintiffs Baker and Copeland by no later than
June 23, 2015.
DONE, this the 19th day of May, 2015.
___/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?