Dunn et al v. Thomas et al

Filing 2612

PHASE 2A REVISED REMEDY SCHEDULING ORDER ON THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM Based on the representations made on the record on September 6, 2019, it is ORDERED that the remaining deadlines and dates for the Phase 2A remedy scheduling order for the Eigh th Amendment claim are revised as follows: Evidentiary Hearing set for 11/12/2019 and 1/24/2020, at 10:00 AM, in CR 2FMJ before Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson; In-person Hearing set for 11/12/2019, at 10:00 AM, in CR 2FMJ, before Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson; as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/9/2019. (furn: calendar, ag)(kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION EDWARD BRAGGS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv601-MHT (WO) PHASE 2A REVISED REMEDY SCHEDULING ORDER ON THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT CLAIM Based on the representations made on the record on September 6, 2019, it is ORDERED that the remaining deadlines and dates for the Phase 2A remedy scheduling order for the Eighth Amendment claim are revised as follows: OLD DATES STAFFING In-person hearing on whether the court should approve parties’ proposed mentalhealth staffing agreement (doc. no. 2606), subject to later determination as to PLRA compliance. NEW DATES 11/15/19 at 10:00 a.m. Evidentiary hearing on whether parties’ proposed mental-health staffing agreement (doc. no. 2606) complies with the PLRA. 3/2/20 at 10:00 a.m. (Stayed until December 13, 2019) SEGREGATION Parties were to develop schemes to verify that defendants are now accurately and timely identifying SMI inmates with regard to segregation. This matter was continued generally pending mediation and resolution of the monitoring issue. The parties are to file a joint statement as to the status of this issue. 9/20/19 at 5:00 p.m. Evidentiary hearing on remedy for violations found in supplemental liability opinion. (Doc. nos. 2353, 2397, & 2398). 11/12/19 at 10:00 a.m. With regard to remedy for violations found in supplemental liability opinion, parties to file briefs updating court as to what the issues are and what documents are relevant. 11/5/19 In-person Hearing on “segregation-like” issue. 11/12/19 at 10:00 a.m. With regard to the “segregation-like” issue, parties to file briefs updating court as to what the issue is and what documents are relevant. 11/5/19 Remedy for remaining violations found in initial liability opinion. Evidentiary hearing already held. Just need to issue opinion. 2 Under submission HOSPITAL-LEVEL CARE Evidentiary hearing on whether parties’ proposed stipulations comply with PLRA. (Doc. no. 2383). 3/2/20 at 10:00 a.m. (Stayed until December 13, 2019) 1/24/20 at 10:00 a.m. Vitek issue: Evidentiary hearing regarding most current facts surrounding hospital-level care. Vitek issue: Plaintiffs to file brief detailing (1) the most recent factual circumstances regarding hospital-level care and (2) why Vitek applies in light of those circumstances. 1/10/20 Vitek issue: Defendants to file brief detailing (1) the most recent factual circumstances regarding hospital-level care and (2) why Vitek does not apply in light of those circumstances. 1/17/20 SUICIDE PREVENTION In-person hearing on whether the court should approve parties’ most recently proposed suicide prevention measures (doc. no. 2606), subject to later determination as to PLRA compliance. 11/15/19 at 10:00 a.m. Evidentiary hearing of whether parties’ most recently proposed suicide prevention measures (doc. no. 2606) complies with the PLRA. Court’s remedial opinion and judgment for immediate relief regarding suicide prevention (doc. nos. 2525 and 2526). Defendants’ motion to alter, amend, or vacate (doc. no. 2564). Interim suicide prevention order (doc. no. 2569) 3 3/2/20 at 10:00 a.m. (Stayed until December 13, 2019) (Stayed until December 13, 2019) (Stayed until December 13, 2019) In effect until December 13, 2019 DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS Evidentiary hearing of whether parties’ proposed stipulations comply with PLRA. (Doc. nos. 2384 & 2382). 3/2/20 at 10:00 a.m. (Stayed until December 13, 2019) MONITORING Remedy. Evidentiary hearing already held. Just need to issue opinion. Under submission as of December 13, 2019 (Stayed until then.) RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND STABILIZATION UNITS Remedy. Evidentiary hearing already held. Just need to issue opinion. Under submission MISCELLANEOUS Evidentiary hearing on whether the following stipulations and orders comply with the PLRA: --Intake (doc. nos. 1780 & 1794) --Coding (doc. nos. 1779 & 1792) --Referral (doc. nos. 1786, 1814, & 1821) --Individual treatment plans (doc. nos. 1853 & 1865) --Psychotherapy and confidentiality (doc. nos. 1893 & 1899) --Definition of SMI (doc. no. 1720) --Bibb segregation issues (doc. nos. 1748 & 1751) --Preplacement screening, etc. (doc. nos. 1798, 1810, 1811, & 1815) --Removing SMIs from segregation (doc. nos. 1855 & 1861) --Confidentiality (doc. nos. 1894 & 1900) --Mental-health understaffing (doc. nos. 2283 & 2301) 4 3/2/20 at 10:00 a.m. (Stayed until December 13, 2019) The parties are to file a joint statement of ALL the orders, stipulations, and agreements (with document numbers cited) for which the court must make findings as to whether they comply with the PLRA. 2/7/20 (Stayed until December 13, 2019) With citations to the record in support of their arguments, the plaintiffs are to file a prehearing brief as to why these orders, stipulations, and agreements comply with the PLRA. 2/12/20 (Stayed until December 13, 2019) With citations to the record in support of their arguments, the defendants are to file a response as to why these orders, stipulations, and agreements do not comply with the PLRA. 2/18/20 (Stayed until December 13, 2019) Pretrial conference on PLRA issue. 2/21/20 at 10:00 a.m. (Stayed until December 13, 2019) DONE, this the 9th day of September, 2019. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?