Dunn et al v. Thomas et al

Filing 3297

ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The plfs' 3261 motion to strike is denied as moot; (2) The plfs' 3231 motion in limine is denied as moot; (3) The court's previous 3256 order for a Daubert hearing regarding dfts' expe rt Greg Schumann is vacated, and the plfs' 3232 Daubert motion to strike is denied as moot; (4) The plfs' 3272 objection to newly disclosed witnesses is denied as moot; (5) Based on the plfs' representation that they have withdrawn all the exhibits from 5/24/2021, through 6/4/2021, to which the dfts objected, the dfts' 3282 objections to those exhibits are overruled as moot; (6) Based on the plfs' representation that the parties have agreed to the admission of the exhibits listed in Exhibit A of the plfs' amended statement (Doc. 3295 -1), those exhibits are admitted. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 6/16/2021. (wcl, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
EDWARD BRAGGS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JEFFERSON S. DUNN, in his
official capacity as
Commissioner of
the Alabama Department of
Corrections, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv601-MHT
(WO)

ORDER
Upon review of the plaintiffs’ amended statement
regarding the status of motions, objections, and exhibits
(Doc. 3295), it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) The plaintiffs’ motion to strike (Doc. 3261) is
denied as moot.
(2) The plaintiffs’ motion in limine (Doc. 3231) is
denied as moot.
(3) The court’s previous order for a Daubert hearing
regarding defendants’ expert Greg Schumann (Doc. 3256)

is vacated, and the plaintiffs’ Daubert motion to strike
(Doc. 3232) is denied as moot.
(4) The plaintiffs’ objection to newly disclosed
witnesses (Doc. 3272) is denied as moot.
(5) Based on the plaintiffs’ representation that they
have

withdrawn

all

the

exhibits

from

May

24,

2021,

through June 4, 2021, to which the defendants objected,
the defendants’ objections to those exhibits (Doc. 3283)
are overruled as moot.
(6) Based on the plaintiffs’ representation that the
parties have agreed to the admission of the exhibits
listed in Exhibit A of the plaintiffs’ amended statement
(Doc. 3295-1), those exhibits are admitted.
DONE, this the 16th day of June, 2021.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE