Dunn et al v. Thomas et al
Filing
3362
ORDER: Based on the representations made on the record during the status conference on 7/21/2021, it is ORDERED that the plfs' 3354 motion to strike and the dfts' 3356 motion for extension of time are denied as moot, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/21/2021. (wcl, )
Case 2:14-cv-00601-MHT-JTA Document 3362 Filed 07/21/21 Page 1 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
EDWARD BRAGGS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JEFFERSON S. DUNN, in his
official capacity as
Commissioner of
the Alabama Department of
Corrections, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv601-MHT
(WO)
ORDER
Based on the representations made on the record
during the status conference on July 21, 2021, it is
ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion to strike (Doc. 3354)
and the defendants’ motion for extension of time (Doc.
3356) are denied as moot, as set forth below.
The
exhibits that are the subject of the plaintiffs’ motion
were
offered
by
the
defendants
in
support
of
their
argument that the court had the legal authority to modify
the existing understaffing remedial order.
See Defs.’
Br. on the Court’s Authority to Grant Relief Regarding
Case 2:14-cv-00601-MHT-JTA Document 3362 Filed 07/21/21 Page 2 of 2
Staffing (Doc. 3349).
The court has already determined
that it has the authority to modify the understaffing
order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).
Order (Doc. 3352).
Accordingly, the plaintiffs’ motion
to strike is moot.
evidence
issues
regarding
presented
remedial
See
The exhibits were not offered as
how
in
the
the
proceedings,
court
recently
including
should
resolve
concluded
what,
if
the
omnibus
any,
modifications to the understaffing remedial order may be
appropriate, and the court will not consider the exhibits
for that purpose.
DONE, this the 21st day of July, 2021.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?