Dunn et al v. Thomas et al

Filing 3445

ORDER, because the court neglected to give the plaintiffs an opportunity to respond to ADOC's consultants' "written clarification," see Order (Doc. 3442 ), it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs have until 12/10/2021, at 5:00 p.m., to respond. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/2/2021. (djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION EDWARD BRAGGS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv601-MHT (WO) ORDER Because the court neglected to give the plaintiffs an opportunity to respond to ADOC’s consultants’ “written clarification,” see Order (Doc. 3442), it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs have until December 10, 2021, at 5:00 p.m., to respond. DONE, this the 2nd day of December, 2021. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?