Dunn et al v. Thomas et al
Filing
4068
ORDER REGARDING RHUs: On 10/27/2023, the parties filed a joint statement outlining the defendants' proposal as to how ADOC will allow its restrictive housing units (RHUs) to function safely with the correctional staff that ADOC currently empl oys. See Joint Statement on Restrictive Housing Opportunities (Doc. 4061 ). At the on-the-record hearing held on 11/3/2023, the parties proposed that there should be ongoing status reports as to the ADOC's progress regarding RHU safe functionin g. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, on or before noon on 11/17/2023, the parties file a joint proposal as to what any such status report should contain and how often a report should be filed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/7/2023. (dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
EDWARD BRAGGS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN HAMM, in his
official capacity as
Commissioner of
the Alabama Department of
Corrections, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv601-MHT
(WO)
ORDER REGARDING RHUs
On
October
27,
2023,
the
parties
filed
a
joint
statement outlining the defendants’ proposal as to how
ADOC will allow its restrictive housing units (RHUs) to
function safely with the correctional staff that ADOC
currently employs.
See Joint Statement on Restrictive
Housing Operations (Doc. 4061).
At the on-the-record
hearing held on November 3, 2023, the parties proposed
that there should be ongoing status reports as to the
ADOC’s
progress
regarding
RHU
safe
functioning.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that, on or before noon on
November 17, 2023, the parties file a joint proposal as
to what any such status report should contain and how
often a report should be filed.
DONE, this the 7th day of November, 2023.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?