Dunn et al v. Thomas et al
Filing
411
ORDER: In light of the fact that the deadline for filing a Phase 1 class-certification motion, as currently set, will leave the court with only 20 business days between the filing of the plaintiffs' reply and the commencement of trial, the defen dants' reasonable request that they be apprised of this court's decision regarding certification no later than five business days prior to trial, see Defendants' 409 Response, and the possibility that the court will require oral argu ment in order to reach a decision regarding certification, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs' 406 Motion for further extension of the deadline for filing Phase 1 class-certification motion is denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/18/2016. (dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
JOSHUA DUNN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JEFFERSON S. DUNN, in his
official capacity as
Commissioner of
the Alabama Department of
Corrections, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv601-MHT
(WO)
ORDER
In light of the fact that the deadline for filing a
Phase 1 class-certification motion, as currently set,
will leave the court with only 20 business days between
the
filing
of
commencement
of
the
trial,
plaintiffs’
the
reply
defendants’
and
the
reasonable
request that they be apprised of this court’s decision
regarding
certification
no
later
than
five
business
days prior to trial, see Defendants’ Response (doc. no.
409), and the possibility that the court will require
oral argument in order to reach a decision regarding
certification,
it
is
ORDERED
that
the
plaintiffs’
motion for further extension of the deadline for filing
their Phase 1 class-certification motion (doc. no. 406)
is denied.
DONE, this the 18th day of April, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?