Dunn et al v. Thomas et al

Filing 411

ORDER: In light of the fact that the deadline for filing a Phase 1 class-certification motion, as currently set, will leave the court with only 20 business days between the filing of the plaintiffs' reply and the commencement of trial, the defen dants' reasonable request that they be apprised of this court's decision regarding certification no later than five business days prior to trial, see Defendants' 409 Response, and the possibility that the court will require oral argu ment in order to reach a decision regarding certification, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs' 406 Motion for further extension of the deadline for filing Phase 1 class-certification motion is denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/18/2016. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JOSHUA DUNN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JEFFERSON S. DUNN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv601-MHT (WO) ORDER In light of the fact that the deadline for filing a Phase 1 class-certification motion, as currently set, will leave the court with only 20 business days between the filing of commencement of the trial, plaintiffs’ the reply defendants’ and the reasonable request that they be apprised of this court’s decision regarding certification no later than five business days prior to trial, see Defendants’ Response (doc. no. 409), and the possibility that the court will require oral argument in order to reach a decision regarding certification, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion for further extension of the deadline for filing their Phase 1 class-certification motion (doc. no. 406) is denied. DONE, this the 18th day of April, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?