Dunn et al v. Thomas et al
Filing
72
ORDER: On 11/24/2014, this court held an on-the-record conference call with counsel for all parties present. It is ORDERED that the 61 Scheduling Order is amended as follows and as further set out in the order: Non-Jury Trial set for 3/14/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2FMJ in Montgomery, AL before Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/1/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2FMJ in Montgomery, AL before Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/27/2016. The class certification motion is set for Oral Argument on 6/24/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2FMJ in Montgomery, AL before Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson. The court will have a resolution of the class certification issue by 7/15/2015 . Discovery due by 11/2/2015. Motions due by 10/2/2015. By no later than 28 days before trial, the parties are to get with the Magistrate Judge and the U.S. Marshal to arrange for the presence of any state inmates. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/26/2014. Copies furnished to calendar group, AG, Transfer Agent, USM.(dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
JOSHUA DUNN, at al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
KIM THOMAS, in his
official capacity as
Commissioner of the
Alabama Department of
Corrections, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv601-MHT
(WO)
ORDER
On November 24, 2014, this court held an on-therecord conference call with counsel for all parties
present, during which several topics were discussed.
Among
those
topics
were
the
previously
entered
scheduling order (doc. no. 61), as well as the desired
pretrial and trial schedule.
Upon consideration of the
previous order and the preferences of the parties, the
court is amending the previous order.
Accordingly,
it
is
ORDERED
that
the
scheduling
order (doc. no. 61) is amended as follows:
(1) The non-jury trial is set for March 14, 2016, at
10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 2FMJ of the Frank M.
Johnson Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One
Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.
(2) The pretrial conference is set for February 1,
2016, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 2FMJ of the
Frank
M.
Johnson
Jr.
United
States
Courthouse
Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.
The parties are to prepare jointly a proposed
pretrial order in accordance with the attached
outline.
The plaintiffs shall ensure that the
proposed pretrial order is received by the court
not later than three business days prior to the
pretrial conference by either (a) delivery of the
order (both hard copy and on disk) to chambers or
(b) by transmitting an electronic copy of the
proposed
pretrial
order
2
to
the
court
as
an
attachment
to
an
email
message
propord_thompson@almd.uscourts.gov.
sent
For
to
these
purposes, the electronic or disk copy should be
in
Word
format
and
not
in
Adobe
Acrobat
PDF
format.
(3) With regard to class-certification experts, the
parties are to do the following:
(A) Plaintiffs
disclosures
shall
on
or
submit
before
their
April
expert
1,
2015.
Plaintiffs must make experts available for
deposition on or before April 15, 2015.
(B) Defendants
disclosures
shall
submit
their
on
before
May
or
1,
expert
2015.
Defendants must make experts available for
deposition on or before May 15, 2015.
(4) With regard to the class-certification motion,
the following applies:
(A) Plaintiffs shall file any motion for class
certification and supporting materials on or
3
before June 1, 2015.
A brief addressing the
factors enumerated in Rule 23(a), (b), and
(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
shall
be
filed
with
any
such
motion.
Defendants must file any opposition to the
motion
on
Plaintiffs
or
before
must
file
June
any
15,
reply
2015.
to
the
defendants’ opposition on or before June 22,
2015.
(B) The class certification motion is set for
oral
argument
a.m.,
in
on
June
Courtroom
24,
2FMJ
of
2015,
the
at
10:00
Frank
M.
Johnson
Jr.
United
States
Courthouse
Complex,
One
Church
Street,
Montgomery,
Alabama.
(C) The
court
will
have
a
resolution
of
the
class certification issue by July 15, 2015.
(5) All discovery is to be completed by November 2,
2015.
4
(6) All dispositive motions and all Daubert motions
are due by October 2, 2015.
A brief and all
supporting evidence shall be filed with any such
motion.
In
all
briefs
filed
by
any
party
relating to the motion, the discussion of the
evidence in the brief must be accompanied by a
specific reference, by page and line, to where
the
evidence
can
be
found
deposition or document.
in
a
supporting
Failure to make such
specific reference will result in the evidence
not being submitted by the court.
(7) With regard to any experts to be used at trial,
by September 1, 2015, the parties shall disclose
to each other the identity of ANY persons who may
be used at trial to present evidence under Rules
701, 702, 703, or 705 of the Federal Rules of
Evidence,
and
provide
the
reports
of
retained
experts or witnesses whose duties as an employee
of
the
party
regularly
5
involved
giving
expert
testimony,
required
by
Rule
26(a)(2)
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
of
the
The parties
shall comply fully with all requirements of Rule
26(a)(2)
in
testimony.
regard
to
disclosure
of
expert
Unless an objection is filed within
14 days after disclosure of any expert witness,
the disclosure shall be deemed to be in full
compliance with the Rule.
(8) Twenty-eight days before trial, each party shall
file
a
list
of
all
its
witnesses
(and
shall
provide to all other parties, pursuant to Rule
26(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
the addresses and telephone numbers of all such
witnesses), except witnesses to be used solely
for impeachment purposes, separately identifying
those whom the party expects to present and those
whom the party may call if the need arises.
The
witness
any
list
witnesses
should
include
required
to
6
be
the
names
disclosed
of
under
Section 8.
Unless specifically agreed between
the parties or allowed by the court for good
cause shown, the parties shall be precluded from
calling any witness not so identified.
(9) Twenty-eight
shall,
days
pursuant
before
to
trial,
the
the
provisions
parties
of
Rule
26(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
file
deposition
designations
expect to use at trial.
within
one
week
that
the
parties
Adverse parties shall
thereafter
file
deposition
designations expected to be used in response, and
a
party
shall
designation
of
within
days
responsive
such
three
parts
of
the
file
the
designation of any part that is desired as a
rebuttal
thereto.
Unless
specifically
agreed
between the parties or allowed by the court for
good cause shown, the parties shall be precluded
from using any part of a deposition or other
document not so listed, with the exception of
7
parts
of
depositions
or
documents
to
solely for the purpose of impeachment.
be
used
Except to
the extent written objections are filed 14 days
prior to the trial date, each party shall be
deemed to have agreed that one of the conditions
for admissibility under Rule 32 of the Federal
Rules
of
Civil
Procedure
is
satisfied
with
respect to any such deposition and that there is
no
objection
Objections
portions
to
shall
objected
the
testimony
state
to,
with
and
so
designated.
particularity
the
objecting
the
party
shall attach a copy of the portions to which the
objections apply.
(10) Twenty-eight
shall,
days
pursuant
before
to
the
trial,
the
provisions
parties
of
Rule
26(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
file exhibit lists and furnish opposing counsel
for
copying
tangible
and
evidence
inspection
to
8
be
all
used
exhibits
at
the
and
trial.
Proffering
counsel
shall
have
such
evidence
marked for identification prior to trial.
specifically
agreed
between
the
Unless
parties
or
allowed by the court for good cause shown, the
parties
shall
be
precluded
from
offering
such
evidence not so furnished and identified, with
the exception of evidence to be used solely for
the purpose of impeachment.
Except to the extent
written objections are filed, the evidence shall
be
deemed
genuine
and
admissible
in
evidence.
Objections shall be filed 14 days prior to the
trial date, and shall set forth the grounds and
legal authorities.
file
a
later
written
than
include
a
14
The offering party shall
response
to
the
objections
days
prior
to
trial
premarked
copy
of
the
and
no
shall
evidence
at
trial,
the
issue.
(11) By
no
later
than
28
days
before
parties are to get with the Magistrate Judge and
9
the U.S. Marshal to arrange for the presence of
any state inmates.
(12) The parties shall also comply with the following:
(A) All briefs on any matter before the court
must be formal in format and filed with the
court.
The court does not accept “letter
briefs” or “letter reports.”
(B) A
request
or
motion
for
extension
of
a
deadline in any court order (i) must be in
writing; (ii) must indicate that movant has,
in
a
timely
manner,
previously
contacted
counsel for all other parties; and (iii),
based on that contact, must state whether
counsel for all other parties agree to or
oppose the extension request or motion.
A
request or motion that fails to meet this
requirement will be denied outright, unless
the movant offers a credible explanation in
the request or motion why this requirement
10
has not been met.
and
unavoidable
control
of
Absent stated unforeseen
circumstances
the
movant,
beyond
oral
the
extension
requests and motions are not allowed, and
"eleventh
hour"
extension
motions
will
be
requests
denied
and
outright.
(C) Any proposed order that a party desires the
court to enter should be submitted to the
court
(i)
in
attachment
transmitting
an
to
Adobe
the
an
Acrobat
motion
electronic
PDF
and
format
(ii)
copy
of
by
the
proposed order to the court as an attachment
to
an
email
message
sent
.
to
For
these purposes, the electronic copy should
be in Word format and not in Adobe Acrobat
PDF format.
If the proposed order relates
to discovery matters (e.g., a HIPAA order or
protective order), an electronic copy of the
11
proposed order should be sent to the e-mail
address
of
the
whose
address
assigned
may
Magistrate
be
found
Judge
at
.
DONE, this the 26th day of November, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson_______
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS
The proposed pretrial order must be joint, and not piecemeal, and it should be reviewed
and approved by all parties BEFORE the pretrial hearing.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, DIVISION
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
Defendant.
)
ORDER ON PRETRIAL HEARING
A pretrial hearing was held in this case on ______, wherein the following proceedings
were held and actions taken:
1.
PARTIES AND TRIAL COUNSEL:
COUNSEL APPEARING AT PRETRIAL HEARING: (same as trial counsel) or
(indicate if different) ____________________
2.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE:
3.
PLEADINGS: The following pleadings and amendments were
allowed:
4.
CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES:
(a)
(b)
5.
The plaintiff(s)
The defendant(s)
STIPULATIONS BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES:
PLEASE LEAVE ORDER UNFINISHED AT THIS POINT FOR COMPLETION BY THE
COURT.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?