Dunn et al v. Thomas et al

Filing 72

ORDER: On 11/24/2014, this court held an on-the-record conference call with counsel for all parties present. It is ORDERED that the 61 Scheduling Order is amended as follows and as further set out in the order: Non-Jury Trial set for 3/14/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2FMJ in Montgomery, AL before Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/1/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2FMJ in Montgomery, AL before Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/27/2016. The class certification motion is set for Oral Argument on 6/24/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2FMJ in Montgomery, AL before Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson. The court will have a resolution of the class certification issue by 7/15/2015 . Discovery due by 11/2/2015. Motions due by 10/2/2015. By no later than 28 days before trial, the parties are to get with the Magistrate Judge and the U.S. Marshal to arrange for the presence of any state inmates. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/26/2014. Copies furnished to calendar group, AG, Transfer Agent, USM.(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION JOSHUA DUNN, at al., Plaintiffs, v. KIM THOMAS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv601-MHT (WO) ORDER On November 24, 2014, this court held an on-therecord conference call with counsel for all parties present, during which several topics were discussed. Among those topics were the previously entered scheduling order (doc. no. 61), as well as the desired pretrial and trial schedule. Upon consideration of the previous order and the preferences of the parties, the court is amending the previous order. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the scheduling order (doc. no. 61) is amended as follows: (1) The non-jury trial is set for March 14, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 2FMJ of the Frank M. Johnson Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. (2) The pretrial conference is set for February 1, 2016, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 2FMJ of the Frank M. Johnson Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. The parties are to prepare jointly a proposed pretrial order in accordance with the attached outline. The plaintiffs shall ensure that the proposed pretrial order is received by the court not later than three business days prior to the pretrial conference by either (a) delivery of the order (both hard copy and on disk) to chambers or (b) by transmitting an electronic copy of the proposed pretrial order 2 to the court as an attachment to an email message propord_thompson@almd.uscourts.gov. sent For to these purposes, the electronic or disk copy should be in Word format and not in Adobe Acrobat PDF format. (3) With regard to class-certification experts, the parties are to do the following: (A) Plaintiffs disclosures shall on or submit before their April expert 1, 2015. Plaintiffs must make experts available for deposition on or before April 15, 2015. (B) Defendants disclosures shall submit their on before May or 1, expert 2015. Defendants must make experts available for deposition on or before May 15, 2015. (4) With regard to the class-certification motion, the following applies: (A) Plaintiffs shall file any motion for class certification and supporting materials on or 3 before June 1, 2015. A brief addressing the factors enumerated in Rule 23(a), (b), and (g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall be filed with any such motion. Defendants must file any opposition to the motion on Plaintiffs or before must file June any 15, reply 2015. to the defendants’ opposition on or before June 22, 2015. (B) The class certification motion is set for oral argument a.m., in on June Courtroom 24, 2FMJ of 2015, the at 10:00 Frank M. Johnson Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. (C) The court will have a resolution of the class certification issue by July 15, 2015. (5) All discovery is to be completed by November 2, 2015. 4 (6) All dispositive motions and all Daubert motions are due by October 2, 2015. A brief and all supporting evidence shall be filed with any such motion. In all briefs filed by any party relating to the motion, the discussion of the evidence in the brief must be accompanied by a specific reference, by page and line, to where the evidence can be found deposition or document. in a supporting Failure to make such specific reference will result in the evidence not being submitted by the court. (7) With regard to any experts to be used at trial, by September 1, 2015, the parties shall disclose to each other the identity of ANY persons who may be used at trial to present evidence under Rules 701, 702, 703, or 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and provide the reports of retained experts or witnesses whose duties as an employee of the party regularly 5 involved giving expert testimony, required by Rule 26(a)(2) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. of the The parties shall comply fully with all requirements of Rule 26(a)(2) in testimony. regard to disclosure of expert Unless an objection is filed within 14 days after disclosure of any expert witness, the disclosure shall be deemed to be in full compliance with the Rule. (8) Twenty-eight days before trial, each party shall file a list of all its witnesses (and shall provide to all other parties, pursuant to Rule 26(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the addresses and telephone numbers of all such witnesses), except witnesses to be used solely for impeachment purposes, separately identifying those whom the party expects to present and those whom the party may call if the need arises. The witness any list witnesses should include required to 6 be the names disclosed of under Section 8. Unless specifically agreed between the parties or allowed by the court for good cause shown, the parties shall be precluded from calling any witness not so identified. (9) Twenty-eight shall, days pursuant before to trial, the the provisions parties of Rule 26(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, file deposition designations expect to use at trial. within one week that the parties Adverse parties shall thereafter file deposition designations expected to be used in response, and a party shall designation of within days responsive such three parts of the file the designation of any part that is desired as a rebuttal thereto. Unless specifically agreed between the parties or allowed by the court for good cause shown, the parties shall be precluded from using any part of a deposition or other document not so listed, with the exception of 7 parts of depositions or documents to solely for the purpose of impeachment. be used Except to the extent written objections are filed 14 days prior to the trial date, each party shall be deemed to have agreed that one of the conditions for admissibility under Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is satisfied with respect to any such deposition and that there is no objection Objections portions to shall objected the testimony state to, with and so designated. particularity the objecting the party shall attach a copy of the portions to which the objections apply. (10) Twenty-eight shall, days pursuant before to the trial, the provisions parties of Rule 26(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, file exhibit lists and furnish opposing counsel for copying tangible and evidence inspection to 8 be all used exhibits at the and trial. Proffering counsel shall have such evidence marked for identification prior to trial. specifically agreed between the Unless parties or allowed by the court for good cause shown, the parties shall be precluded from offering such evidence not so furnished and identified, with the exception of evidence to be used solely for the purpose of impeachment. Except to the extent written objections are filed, the evidence shall be deemed genuine and admissible in evidence. Objections shall be filed 14 days prior to the trial date, and shall set forth the grounds and legal authorities. file a later written than include a 14 The offering party shall response to the objections days prior to trial premarked copy of the and no shall evidence at trial, the issue. (11) By no later than 28 days before parties are to get with the Magistrate Judge and 9 the U.S. Marshal to arrange for the presence of any state inmates. (12) The parties shall also comply with the following: (A) All briefs on any matter before the court must be formal in format and filed with the court. The court does not accept “letter briefs” or “letter reports.” (B) A request or motion for extension of a deadline in any court order (i) must be in writing; (ii) must indicate that movant has, in a timely manner, previously contacted counsel for all other parties; and (iii), based on that contact, must state whether counsel for all other parties agree to or oppose the extension request or motion. A request or motion that fails to meet this requirement will be denied outright, unless the movant offers a credible explanation in the request or motion why this requirement 10 has not been met. and unavoidable control of Absent stated unforeseen circumstances the movant, beyond oral the extension requests and motions are not allowed, and "eleventh hour" extension motions will be requests denied and outright. (C) Any proposed order that a party desires the court to enter should be submitted to the court (i) in attachment transmitting an to Adobe the an Acrobat motion electronic PDF and format (ii) copy of by the proposed order to the court as an attachment to an email message sent <propord_thompson@almd.uscourts.gov>. to For these purposes, the electronic copy should be in Word format and not in Adobe Acrobat PDF format. If the proposed order relates to discovery matters (e.g., a HIPAA order or protective order), an electronic copy of the 11 proposed order should be sent to the e-mail address of the whose address assigned may Magistrate be found Judge at <http://www.almd.uscourts.gov/judges/propord .htm>. DONE, this the 26th day of November, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson_______ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NOTICE TO ATTORNEYS The proposed pretrial order must be joint, and not piecemeal, and it should be reviewed and approved by all parties BEFORE the pretrial hearing. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. Defendant. ) ORDER ON PRETRIAL HEARING A pretrial hearing was held in this case on ______, wherein the following proceedings were held and actions taken: 1. PARTIES AND TRIAL COUNSEL: COUNSEL APPEARING AT PRETRIAL HEARING: (same as trial counsel) or (indicate if different) ____________________ 2. JURISDICTION AND VENUE: 3. PLEADINGS: The following pleadings and amendments were allowed: 4. CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES: (a) (b) 5. The plaintiff(s) The defendant(s) STIPULATIONS BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES: PLEASE LEAVE ORDER UNFINISHED AT THIS POINT FOR COMPLETION BY THE COURT.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?