Godwin v. Forniss, et al. (INMATE 3)

Filing 18

ORDERED that (1) The 17 Recommendation is ADOPTED; (2) Petitioner's 1 petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 USC 2254 is DENIED; and (3) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition was filed after expiration of the one-year limitation period in 28 USC 2244(d). Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/22/2016. (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
DANNY GODWIN, # 208488,
Petitioner,
v.
LEON FORNISS, et al.,
Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-604-WKW

ORDER
On June 29, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no
timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 17.) Upon an independent review of the
file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that
(1)

The Recommendation is ADOPTED;

(2)

Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(Doc. # 1) is DENIED; and
(3)

This case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the petition was filed

after expiration of the one-year limitation period in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).
A separate final judgment will be entered.
DONE this 22nd day of July, 2016.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE