Wilkerson v. Gozdan et al(MAG+)
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING 6 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; ORDERING that, to the extent plf asserts a claim for criminal prosecution of Defendants, such claim is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, as Plf lacks stand ing to pursue it and further that Plf's remaining claims are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), without an opportunity for amendment, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/19/14. (djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
EDDIE WILKERSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEPHAN GOZDAN,
Chief Financial Officer, Cenlar, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-693-WKW
ORDER
On July 29, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no
timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 6.) Upon an independent review of the file
and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED
that, to the extent Plaintiff asserts a claim for criminal prosecution of Defendants, such
claim is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, as Plaintiff lacks
standing to pursue it and further that Plaintiff’s remaining claims are DISMISSED
with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), without an opportunity for
amendment, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
DONE this 19th day of August, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?