Hargrove v. Thomas (INMATE 2)
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 7 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. It is ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs § 1983 claims against defendant Kim Thomas are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); 2. Plaintiffs challenge to the c onstitutionality of the conditions of his confinement at the Limestone Correctional Facility which occurred from March 2006 through 2009 are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as such claims are n ot filed within the time prescribed by the applicable period of limitations; and 2. This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-ii). An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 12/23/2014. (dmn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
GONZALES HARGROVE,
# 158373,
Plaintiff,
v.
KIM T. THOMAS,
COMMISSIONER,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:14-CV-697-WKW
ORDER
On November 4, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation. (Doc.
# 7.) After a review of the recommendation, to which no timely objections have
been filed, and after an independent review of the entire record, it is ORDERED that
the recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s § 1983 claims against defendant Kim Thomas are
DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii);
2.
Plaintiff’s challenge to the constitutionality of the conditions of
his confinement at the Limestone Correctional Facility which occurred from March
2006 through 2009 are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as such claims are not filed within the time prescribed by
the applicable period of limitations; and
2.
This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i-ii).
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE this 23rd day of December, 2014.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?