Ryles v. Bentley, et al. (INMATE 1)

Filing 16

ORDER directing that, there being no timely objection filed to the 15 Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Motion to Certify Case as a Class Action (Doc. # 8 ) is DENIED. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 9/24/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION SANFORD LEONARD RYLES, #167820, Plaintiff, vs. ROBERT BENTLEY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:14cv754-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #15), entered on September 3, 2014. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Case as a Class Action (Doc. #8) is DENIED. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE this 24th day of September, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?