Porter v. Bentley, et al. (INMATE 2)

Filing 9

ORDER directing that, there being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of the Plaintiff to pay the requisite fees or provide the court with financial information in compliance with the orders of the court. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 10/28/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION BRANDON PORTER, AIS #226357, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, vs. ROBERT BENTLEY, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 2:14cv-759-WHA (WO) ORDER This case is before the court on the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #8), entered on October 7, 2014. There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and after a review of the file, the Recommendation is ADOPTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure of the Plaintiff to pay the requisite fees or provide the court with financial information in compliance with the orders of the court. Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. DONE this 28th day of October, 2014. /s/ W. Harold Albritton W. HAROLD ALBRITTON SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?