Nelson v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 106

ORDER: On 6/6/2016, the plaintiff filed a complaint to recover a sum certain (doc. 105 ) which the court construes as a motion to amend the complaint. He also filed a motion for appointment of counsel (doc. 104 ). Upon consideration of the motions, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that, to the extent that the 105 motion to amend clarifies his request for damages, the motion to amend be and is hereby GRANTED. The motion to amend is DENIED in all other respects. It is further ORDERED that the 104 motion for appointment of counsel be and is hereby DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge Charles S. Coody on 6/7/2016. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CURTIS EDWARD NELSON,
AIS # 175965,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
EDWARD D. HAYNES, et al.,
Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:14cv855-CSC
[WO]

ORDER
On June 6, 2016, the plaintiff filed a “complaint to recover a sum certain” (doc. # 105)
which the court construes as a motion to amend the complaint. He also filed a motion for
appointment of counsel (doc. # 104). Upon consideration of the motions, and for good cause,
it is
ORDERED that, to the extent that the motion to amend (doc. # 105) clarifies his
request for damages, the motion to amend be and is hereby GRANTED. The motion to
amend is DENIED in all other respects. It is further
ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel (doc. # 104) be and is hereby
DENIED.
Done this 7th day of June, 2016.

/s/Charles S. Coody
CHARLES S. COODY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE