Williams v. Caton et al (MAG+)

Filing 23

JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's 20 Recommendation is adopted. (2) The 9 Motion to Dismiss is granted to the extent that it seeks to dismiss as defendants Jim Caton and Jessie Summerset, and said defendants are dismissed without prejudice and terminated as parties, with all parties to bear their own costs. (3) The 9 Motion to Dismiss is denied to the extent it is based on the contention that Andalusia Ti re Company is not a defendant. It is declared that Andalusia Tire Company was named as a defendant in the original complaint. (4) Because defendant Andalusia Tire Company was inadvertently omitted from the docket sheet, the clerk of the court is to a dd said defendant to the docket sheet, as of the filing of the original complaint, and to initiate the paperwork for service on it. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This csae is not closed, and is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/23/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION MICHEAL GERMAINE WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) JIM CATON, JESSIE ) SUMMERSET, and ANDALUSIA ) TIRE COMPANY, ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv873-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 20) is adopted. (2) The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 9) is granted to the extent that it seeks to dismiss as defendants Jim Caton and Jessie Summerset, and said defendants are dismissed without prejudice and terminated as parties, with all parties to bear their own costs. (3) The motion to dismiss (doc. no. 9) is denied to the extent it is based on the contention that Andalusia Tire Company is not a defendant. It is declared that Andalusia Tire Company was named as a defendant in the original complaint. (4) Because defendant Andalusia Tire Company was inadvertently omitted from the docket sheet, the clerk of the court is to add said defendant to the docket sheet, as of the filing of the original complaint, and to initiate the paperwork for service on it. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed, and is referred back to the United States Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 23rd day of September, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?