Carey v. Billups, et al. (INMATE 1)

Filing 37

OPINION AND ORDER directing that: (1) The recommendation of the magistrate judge (doc. no. 32 ) is adopted; (2) The plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 28 ) is denied; (3) This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on February 19, 2015. (scn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
CARLOS CAREY, #245045,
Plaintiff,
v.
PHYLLIS BILLUPS, et al.,
Defendants.
CARLOS CAREY, #245045,
Plaintiff,
v.
KIM THOMAS, et al.,
Defendants.
CARLOS CAREY, #245045,
Plaintiff,
v.
FRANETTA RILEY, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-888-MHT
)
(WO)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-948-MHT
)
(WO)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-955-MHT
)
(WO)
)
)
)

OPINION AND ORDER
This case is now before the court on the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary
injunction. The motion contends that prison officials have been interfering with mail sent
between the plaintiff and witnesses to this lawsuit. The United States Magistrate Judge

entered a recommendation denying the motion for failure to meet the legal standard
applicable on a motion for preliminary injunction. No objections to the recommendation
have been received. After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, it is
ORDERED that:
(1) The recommendation of the magistrate judge (doc. no. 32) is adopted.
(2) The plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (doc. no. 28) is denied.
(3) This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings.
DONE, this the 19th day of February, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson___________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE