Smith v. Edge, et al.
ORDER denying 57 Motion to extend the dispositive-motion deadline, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/26/15. (djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
ROBERT EDGE, II, and PFG
CIVIL ACTION NO.
dispositive-motions deadline (doc. no. 57) is denied.
* * *
motion for extension of a deadline in any court order
... must indicate that movant has, in a timely manner,
previously contacted counsel for all other parties; and
..., based on that contact, must state whether counsel
for all other parties agree to or oppose the extension
request or motion,” and that, “A request or motion that
fails to meet this requirement will be denied outright,
unless the movant offers a credible explanation in the
request or motion why this requirement has not been
met.” Scheduling Order (doc. no. 11), § 15(B).
here has failed to comply with this requirement.
Moreover, “Absent stated unforeseen and unavoidable
‘eleventh hour’ extension requests and motions will be
The movant has failed to offer
any explanation as to why this motion was filed more
than a month after the deadline for dispositive motions
DONE, this the 26th day of October, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?