Robinson v. Alexander et al(MAG+)

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING 9 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's state-law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and (3) this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3). A separate final judgment will be entered. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/9/2015. (dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION NEKISHA S. ROBINSON, on behalf of O.Z.J., Plaintiff, v. LILLY ALEXANDER, M.D., and PRO ASSURANCE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:14-CV-936-WKW [WO] ORDER On December 11, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 9.) Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) The Recommendation (Doc. # 9) is ADOPTED; (2) Plaintiff’s state-law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and (3) this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3). A separate final judgment will be entered. DONE this 9th day of January, 2015. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?