Sealey v. Stidham et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)

Filing 36

JUDGMENT: Pursuant to plaintiff Melvin L. Sealey's 34 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, and in accordance with the 35 Memorandum Opinion entered today, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: (1) All claims against defendants Tamara A. Stidham, Edward A. R. Miller, Richard A. Wright, and Kelly S. King are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and these defendants are terminated as parties, with costs taxed as paid.(2) The 30 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is withdrawn only as to defendants Stidham, Miller, Wright, and King. (3) The 30 Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, to which there has been no objection, is adopted as to defendant Branch Banking a nd Trust, with only the minor exception as to the reasoning discussed in the companion opinion entered today. (4) Defendant Branch Banking and Trusts 2 Motion to dismiss is granted. (5) Plaintiff Sealeys 21 Motion for leave to amend complaint is denied. (6) Plaintiff Sealeys 22 Petition to continue proceedings and compel disclosure is denied. (7) Plaintiff Sealeys 8 Motion for miscellaneous relief is denied. (8) All claims against defendant Branch Banking and Trust are dismissed without prejudice and said defendant is terminated as a party, with costs taxed against plaintiff Sealey, for which execution may issue. It is further ORDERED that all other outstanding motions are denied. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 8/27/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION MELVIN L. SEALEY, Plaintiff, v. TAMARA A. STIDHAM (Senior Vice Pres. of Branch Banking and Trust Company), et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv1036-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT Pursuant to plaintiff Melvin L. Sealey’s notice of voluntary dismissal (doc. no. 34), and in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is Tamara A. ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: (1) All claims against defendants Stidham, Edward A. R. Miller, Richard A. Wright, and Kelly S. King are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and these defendants are terminated as parties, with costs taxed as paid. (2) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 30) is withdrawn only as to defendants Stidham, Miller, Wright, and King. (3) The recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 30), to which there has been no objection, is adopted as to defendant Branch Banking and Trust, with only the minor exception as to the reasoning discussed in the companion opinion entered today. (4) Defendant Branch Banking and Trust’s motion to dismiss (doc. no. 2) is granted. (5) Plaintiff Sealey’s motion for leave to amend complaint (doc. no. 21) is denied. (6) Plaintiff proceedings and Sealey’s compel petition disclosure to (doc. continue no. 22) is denied. (7) Plaintiff Sealey’s motion for miscellaneous relief (doc. no. 26) is denied. (8) All claims against defendant Branch Banking and Trust are dismissed without prejudice and said defendant is terminated as a party, with costs taxed 2 against plaintiff Sealey, for which execution may issue. It is further ORDERED that all other outstanding motions are denied. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 27th day of August, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3 Civil

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?