Henry v. Gibson

Filing 50

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) def Gibson's 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment is granted; (2) judgment is entered in favor of def Gibson against pl f Mary Jo Henry, with plf Henry taking nothing by her complaint; further ORDERING that all other pending motions are denied as moot; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plf Henry, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/23/15. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist). Furnished to calendar group & AG (terminates Jury Selection and Jury Trial 11/30/2015).(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION MARY JO HENRY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. SLOAN D. GIBSON, Acting Secretary Department of Veteran Affairs, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv1049-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant Sloan D. Gibson’s motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 24) is granted. (2) Judgment Gibson and is against entered in plaintiff favor Mary Jo of defendant Henry, with plaintiff Henry taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED motions are denied as moot. that all other pending It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Henry, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 23rd day of November, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?