Lowe et al v. United States Department of Justice et al(MAG+)

Filing 10

ORDER as follows: 1. Plaintiff's objections (Docs. 7 , 8 , 9 ) are OVERRULED; 2. The 6 Recommendation is ADOPTED; and 3. Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). An appropriate final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 1/6/2015. (dmn, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
PHILLIPPI S. LOWE,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES DEP’T OF
JUSTICE, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-1056-WKW

ORDER
Before the court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. # 6) to which Plaintiff has filed objections (Docs. # 7–9). Based upon an
independent and de novo review of the Recommendation, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b),
it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

Plaintiff’s objections (Docs. # 7–9) are OVERRULED;

2.

The Recommendation (Doc. # 6) is ADOPTED; and

3.

Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service

of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
An appropriate final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 6th day of January, 2015.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE