McClain v. SSC Montgomery Cedar Crest Operating Company LLC, et al.

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that the removing party has until November 14, 2014 to amend the notice of removal to allege jurisdiction sufficiently, 28 U.S.C. § 1653; otherwise this lawsuit shall be remanded to state court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 11/7/14. (scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION KELVIN McCLAIN, as Attorney in Fact for Mervin McClain, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SSC MONTGOMERY CEDAR CREST ) OPERATING COMPANY LLC, et ) al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14cv1070-MHT (WO) OPINION AND ORDER The allegations insufficient to jurisdiction under citizenship) and of the invoke 28 1441 U.S.C. notice this §§ (removal). of removal court's 1332 To removal (diversity invoke are of removal jurisdiction based on diversity, the notice of removal must distinctly and affirmatively allege each party's citizenship. McGovern v. American Airlines, Inc., 511 F. 2d 653, 654 (5th Cir. 1975) (per curiam).* * The In Bonner v. Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit Court of allegations must show that the citizenship of each plaintiff is different from that of each defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1332; see also 2 James Wm. Moore, et al., Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 8.03[5][b] at 8-10 (3d ed. 1998). The notice of removal fails to meet this standard. First, the notice alleges the "residence" rather than the "citizenship" Farrugia, and of the members liability companies. plaintiff, of the defendant defendant Alan limited An allegation that a party is a "resident" of a State is not sufficient to establish that a party is a "citizen" of that State. Delome v. Union Barge Line Co., 444 F.2d 225, 233 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 995 (1971). The removal notice is also insufficient because it does not indicate the citizenship of two parties that are ‘limited liability companies’: SSC Montgomery Cedar Crest Operating Company LLC and Comfort Dental of Appeals adopted as binding precedent all of the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981. 2 Dothan LLC. “[L]ike a limited partnership, a limited liability company is a citizen of any state of which a member of the company is a citizen.” MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings Rolling Greens L.L.C., 374 F.3d 1020, 1022 (11th Cir. 2004). The notice must therefore allege all “the citizenships of limited liability company.” the Id. members of the And as stated above, the notice does not properly allege the citizenship of the members of the defendant limited liability companies. Finally, plaintiff has brought this lawsuit in his capacity as personal representative for an incompetent individual. "[T]he legal representative of an infant or incompetent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the U.S.C. § 1332(c)(2). attempts to set infant or incompetent." 28 Because the notice of removal forth the citizenship of only the personal representative and not that of the incompetent person, the notice does not 3 adequately establish grounds for this court to assume removal jurisdiction of this matter. *** It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that the removing party has until November 14, 2014 to amend the notice of removal to allege jurisdiction sufficiently, 28 U.S.C. § 1653; otherwise this lawsuit shall be remanded to state court. DONE, this the 7th day of November, 2014. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?