Sewell v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Filing
7
JUDGMENT directing that: (1) The petitioner's motion to withdraw, etc. (doc. no. 6 ) is granted; (2) The petitioner's petition for habeas relief (doc. no. 1 ) is withdrawn and this case is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice; furt her ORDERED that the magistrate judge's recommendation (doc. no. 2 ) is not adopted as moot; further ORDERED that the petitioner's motion challenging judicial authority (doc. no 3 ) is denied as moot; further ORDERED that no costs are tax ed; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/20/15. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
TIMOTHY JEVON SEWELL,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv1109-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court
that:
(1) The petitioner’s motion to withdraw, etc. (doc.
no. 6) is granted.
(2) The
petitioner’s
petition
for
habeas
relief
(doc. no. 1) is withdrawn and this case is dismissed in
its entirety without prejudice.
It is further ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s
recommendation (doc. no. 2) is not adopted as moot.
It is further ORDERED that the petitioner’s motion
challenging judicial authority (doc. no 3) is denied as
moot.
It is further ORDERED that no costs are taxed.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 20th day of January, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Civil
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?