Rainer v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 11

ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation (Doc. # 10 ) is ADOPTED. 2. The Rule 60(b) motion (Doc. # 1 ) challenging the integrity of the proceedings in Petitioner's first 2255 motion in this court (Case No. 2:11-CV-414-MEF) is DENIED. 3. Pursu ant to 28 U.S.C. 1631, this case, which now consists of Petitioner's challenge to the term of supervised release imposed by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the necessary steps to effectuate the terms of this order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 5/17/2017. (kh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
LORENZO RANIER,
# 12240-002,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:14-CV-1136-WKW
[WO]

ORDER
On April 13, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which
no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 10.) Upon an independent review of
the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as
follows:
1.

The Recommendation (Doc. # 10) is ADOPTED.

2.

The Rule 60(b) motion (Doc. # 1) challenging the integrity of the

proceedings in Petitioner’s first § 2255 motion in this court (Case No. 2:11-CV414-MEF) is DENIED.
3.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631, this case, which now consists of Petitioner’s

challenge to the term of supervised release imposed by the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Georgia, is TRANSFERRED to the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the necessary steps to
effectuate the terms of this order.
DONE this 17th day of May, 2017.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE