Barrow v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 2)

Filing 13

JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's 11 Recommendation is adopted. (2) The 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied without prejudice because petitioner has f ailed to exhaust states remedies. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/13/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER LEWIS BARROW,

)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
SHERIFF RUSSELL THOMAS and )
LUTHER STRANGE,
)
)
Respondents.
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:14cv1260-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The

United

States

Magistrate

Judge's

recommendation (doc. no. 11) is adopted.
(2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc.
no. 1) is denied without prejudice because petitioner
has failed to exhaust state remedies.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document

on

the

civil

pursuant

to

Rule

58

of

docket
the

as

a

Federal

final
Rules

judgment
of

Civil

Procedure.
DONE, this the 13th day of July, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE