Childers v. Reynolds (MAG+)
ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is ORDERED that the 8 Recommendation is ADOPTED, that the 9 motion for discovery and for inspection of evidence is DENIED, and that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, as further set out. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on February 6, 2015. (scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
LESLIE RENEE CHILDERS,
SIBLEY G. REYNOLDS,
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-9-WKW
On January 13, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this
case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 8.) Since the filing of
the Recommendation, Plaintiff has filed a motion for discovery and for inspection
of evidence (Doc. # 9), but the motion cannot be construed as containing a cogent
legal objection to the Magistrate Judge’s legal reasoning.
Upon an independent review of the file in this case, it is ORDERED that the
Recommendation is ADOPTED, that the motion for discovery and for inspection
of evidence is DENIED, and that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
An appropriate final judgment will be entered separately.
DONE this 6th day of February, 2015.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?