Moore v. Brooks et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 13

OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that: (1) The 9 recommendation of the US Magistrate Judge is adopted; (2) The plf's 5 motion for preliminary injunction is denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/30/2015. (wcl, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

SAMUEL MOORE,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
OFFICER BROOKS and OFFICER )
(SGT.) TEAL,
)
)
Defendants.
)

CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv62-MHT
(WO)

OPINION AND ORDER
This

cause

is

before

the

court

on

the

recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge
that

the

plaintiff’s

motion

injunction be denied.
sought

to

be

moved

for

a

preliminary

In his motion, the plaintiff
from

Easterling

Correctional

Facility to another prison due to alleged harassment
and threats by correctional officers in retaliation for
plaintiff’s lawsuits.

There are no objections to the

recommendation; in addition, the plaintiff’s copy of
the recommendation was returned to the clerk’s office
as

undeliverable

because

the

plaintiff

is

no

longer

incarcerated at Easterling.
***
Accordingly,

after

an

independent

and

de

novo

review of the record, it is ORDERED that:
(1)

The

recommendation

of

the

United

States

Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 9) is adopted.
(2)

The

plaintiff’s

motion

for

preliminary

injunction (doc. no. 5) is denied.
DONE, this the 30th day of April, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE