Tarver v. Caldwell et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
36
ORDERED as follows: 1. The Order (Doc. # 34 ) adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge on April 28, 2015, is VACATED in light of the extension (Doc. # 35 ) of the deadline by which to object. 2. The Recommendation (Doc. # 27 ) is ADOPTE D. 3. Plaintiff Robert Tarver's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 1 ) is DENIED. 4. This action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/4/2015. (kh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ROBERT TARVER,
# 113 144,
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. A. CALDWELL, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-077-WKW
ORDER
On April 6, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation, to which no
timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 27.) Upon an independent review of the
file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Order (Doc. # 34) adopting the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge on April 28, 2015, is VACATED in light of the extension (Doc. # 35) of the
deadline by which to object.
2. The Recommendation (Doc. # 27) is ADOPTED.
3. Plaintiff Robert Tarver’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 1) is
DENIED.
4. This action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings
in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636.
DONE this 4th day of August, 2015.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?