Mack v. State of Alabama, et al. (INMATE 3)
Filing
7
OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 4 ) is adopted; (2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 1 ) is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to take all actions necessary to effect the transfer; this case is closed in this court. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 03/12/2015. (scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
ERIC W. MACK,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF ALABAMA and
LUTHER STRANGE, Attorney
General of the State of
Alabama,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv110-MHT
(WO)
OPINION AND ORDER
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254, petitioner, a state
inmate, filed this lawsuit seeking habeas relief.
This
lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation
of the United States Magistrate Judge that this case be
transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 to the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
No objections to the recommendation have been filed.
After an independent and de novo review of the record,
the
court
concludes
that
the
recommendation should be adopted.
magistrate
judge’s
Accordingly, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE
of the court as follows:
(1) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 4) is adopted.
(2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc.
no. 1) is transferred to the United States District
Court for the Northern District of Alabama.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to take all
actions necessary to effect the transfer.
This case is closed in this court.
DONE, this the 12th day of March, 2015.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?