Dunklin v. Harden (INMATE 1)

Filing 41

ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The 40 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) Dft's 28 & 34 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 3) Judgment is GRANTED in favor of Dft; 4) This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 5) Costs are taxed against Plf Robert Dunklin. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 8/31/2017. (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ROBERT DUNKLIN, #227652, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF KENNY HARDEN, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:15-CV-124-WKW [WO] ORDER Before the court is the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. (Doc. # 40.) There being no timely objection filed to the Recommendation, and based on a review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 40) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. # 28, 34) is GRANTED; 3. Judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendant; 4. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 5. Costs are taxed against Plaintiff Robert Dunklin. A final judgment will be entered separately. DONE this 31st day of August, 2017. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?