James v. Workforce Walker Personnel, LLC(MAG+)
Filing
13
OPINION. An appropriate judgment will be entered. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/7/2016. (dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
ANGELA D. BELL JAMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
WORKFORCE/WALKER
PERSONNEL, LLC,
Defendant.
ANGELA D. BELL JAMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
WORKFORCE/WALKER
PERSONNEL, LLC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv156-MHT
(WO)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv485-MHT
(WO)
OPINION
Plaintiff
filed
these
lawsuits
asserting
that
defendant, a temporary employment agency, discriminated
against her on the basis of race and disability.
These
lawsuits are now before the court on the recommendation
of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff’s
cases
be
dismissed
without
prejudice;
and
that
the
pleading styled “Title of Motion: To add” (doc. no. 7
in
2:15-cv-156),
in
which
plaintiff
appears
to
seek
leave to “add” a second completed EEOC charge (the same
charge underlying the complaint filed in plaintiff’s
second case against defendant), to the record of her
first-filed case, be denied as moot in view of the
consolidation of the two cases.
Also before the court
is plaintiff’s “Appeal to Discrimination Case” (doc.
no. 10), which the court construes as objections to the
recommendation.
review
of
plaintiff’s
the
After
an
record,
objections
independent
the
should
court
be
and
de
novo
concludes
that
overruled
and
magistrate judge’s recommendation adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
DONE, this the 7th day of March, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?