James v. Workforce Walker Personnel, LLC(MAG+)
Filing
14
JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's 10 Objections are overruled. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/7/2016. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 9 Recommendation i s adopted. (3) These lawsuits are dismissed without prejudice,with no costs taxed. (4) Plaintiffs 7 Motion to add is denied as moot.It is further ORDERED that plaintiffs 12 Motion for 60 days to continue to look for a lawyer is denied. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter thisdocument on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Both these cases are closed. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
ANGELA D. BELL JAMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
WORKFORCE/WALKER
PERSONNEL, LLC,
Defendant.
ANGELA D. BELL JAMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
WORKFORCE/WALKER
PERSONNEL, LLC,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv156-MHT
(WO)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:15cv485-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Plaintiff's
overruled.
objections
(doc.
no.
10)
are
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 9) is adopted.
(3) These lawsuits are dismissed without prejudice,
with no costs taxed.
(4) Plaintiff’s motion “to add” (doc. no. 7) is
denied as moot.
It is further ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion “for
60 days to continue to look for a lawyer” (doc. no. 12)
is denied.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Procedure.
Both these cases are closed.
DONE, this the 7th day of March, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Civil
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?