Erwood v. Aspire Staffing, LLC et al (MAG+)
Filing
21
ORDERED that the 20 Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Defendant Mark Free's 8 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff Shalako S. Erwood's Title VII claims against Mr. Free are DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Erwood's Title VII claims against Defendant Aspire Staffing, LLC, are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/13/2015. (kh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
SHALAKO S. ERWOOD,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
ASPIRE STAFFING, LLC, and
MARK FREE,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:15-CV-207-WKW
ORDER
On June 26, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 20), to
which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file
and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the
Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Defendant Mark Free’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc.
# 8) is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff Shalako S. Erwood’s Title VII claims against Mr.
Free are DISMISSED with prejudice.
It is further ORDERED that Mr. Erwood’s Title VII claims against Defendant
Aspire Staffing, LLC, are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings
in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636.
DONE this 13th day of July, 2015.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?