Erwood v. Aspire Staffing, LLC et al (MAG+)

Filing 21

ORDERED that the 20 Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Defendant Mark Free's 8 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff Shalako S. Erwood's Title VII claims against Mr. Free are DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Erwood's Title VII claims against Defendant Aspire Staffing, LLC, are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/13/2015. (kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION SHALAKO S. ERWOOD, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ASPIRE STAFFING, LLC, and MARK FREE, Defendants. CASE NO. 2:15-CV-207-WKW ORDER On June 26, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 20), to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED, that Defendant Mark Free’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 8) is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff Shalako S. Erwood’s Title VII claims against Mr. Free are DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Mr. Erwood’s Title VII claims against Defendant Aspire Staffing, LLC, are referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. DONE this 13th day of July, 2015. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?